Across Australia, we are seeing the roll out of the ‘Safer Baby Bundle’. This is an initiative to reduce stillbirth. This is an obviously noble goal, with five key areas of focus in the form of hashtagable social messaging. The five key areas are:
#Quit4Baby #GrowingMatters #MovementsMatter #SleeponSide #LetsTalkTiming
As I explored the resources associated with the initiative, I became concerned about the language, intention and potential outcomes. When we roll out a blanket protocol, to reduce one outcome, what other risks come into play?
Of particular concern to me is the ‘Growing Matters’ and ‘Let’s Talk Timing’ focus areas.
#growing matters puts emphasis on ATTENDING ALL APPOINTMENTS. The focus is on ASSESS, MEASURE and MONITOR. This surveillance focus can lead to The Nocebo Effect : which is to say, create a problem by increasing stress. What they are looking for is ‘Fetal Growth Restriction’. This is where measuring the fundal height (from 24 weeks) comes in…but if you are declared to have risk factors, this may look like ultrasounds. One of the risk factors is a BMI above 30 (which is 30% of adult females in Australia). Many women report being discriminated again for BMI alone, regardless of other factors to be considered.
#Letstalktiming introduces the concept of ‘planned birth’ at 28 weeks in the form of a brochure. This is incredibly coercive, as like ‘planned pregnancy’, this implies it is somehow better than an ‘unplanned’ one…more responsible? This normalises induction and pre-labour caesarean, which is perhaps an attempt to justify the rapidly increasing rates.
The risk factors, listed are ‘above gestational diabetes, being ‘older’, above ‘healthy weight’, having your first baby, having conceived via IVF, some ethnicities or cultural groups, smoking, drinking or drug use throughout pregnancy. This pretty much includes everyone. The vagueness of ‘older’ and ‘above healthy weight’ are shockingly open for interpretation.
The brochure allows 4 lines for your notes and questions. Suggesting that there isn’t that much to consider, or your input is limited. It also encourages ‘shared decision making’…to reach the “best decision”. What might that be? It sounds rather coercive. This ‘decision aid’ is inline with the consent-model of care, and the trouble with consent, is the assumed yes.
The brochure speaks of how rare stillbirth is, but then uses language that suggests the medical pathway is the safer one. It does not go into the risks associated with induction, or caesarean.
The language in this brochure over emphasises the safety of medicalised management of timing of birth, by using language like ‘planned birth’ instead of calling it what it is: induction or caesarean, is willfully misleading.
There are three ways to enter The Birth Map.
- No labour
each pathway will look different and hold different dangers, risks and opportunities. It is up to you to determine what is right for you. There is No One Way.
see also: Context-based Maternity Care
1 thought on “Timing of Birth”
It’s all an obstetric push back to the undercurrent of being called out… obstetric violence/birth trauma, statistics highlighting increasing intervention, etc